Booziest US Flight Destination Cities Surprises

If alcohol promotes conviviality, then the friendliest skies of any in the US hover above a handful of cities—those en route to which passengers consume the most amount of booze.

You’d expect Vegas to top the list, and it does. But Seattle? Passengers bound for second-ranked Seattle, according to a recent analysis, are drinking more than coffee.

Passengers on flights to certain cities spend more money on alcohol.

World Series of Poker kicks off in Las Vegas

These rankings are the work of GuestLogix, Toronto supplier of in-flight payment systems to some 90 percent of North American airlines. The company analyzed the inflight sales of five carriers between November 2013 and February 2014, breaking sales down into categories including comfort items (pillows, headsets, in-flight entertainment, etc.), food (both fresh and packaged) and beverages. Sales of liquor, beer and wine accounted for 99 percent of all beverage dollars spent by passengers.

During the three-month period studied, beverage sales onboard flights to Las Vegas totaled $2.69 million, or about $93 per flight. Seattle’s average per flight was $79. Other very friendly skies belonged to Fort Lauderdale ($68), and San Francisco and Phoenix (tied at about $65 each).

Skies over Elmira, New York, weren’t especially friendly ($28). Those over Scranton ($23) were dour.

Ilia Kostov, GuestLogix’s executive vice president for sales and marketing, tells ABC News that a variety of factors determine how much alcohol gets consumed on any given flight. Longer flights—those lasting 3 hours or more—typically enjoy higher consumption. Both Vegas and Seattle, he says, are transcontinental destinations. “There’s definitely a correlation between sales per flight and flight duration,” he says. The size of the plane also is a factor: “The bigger the plane, the more passengers aboard, the higher the beverage sales.”

America’s airlines accused of hiding the total cost of travel

Passenger mindset also matters: Jay Sorensen, president of IdeaWorksCompany, a leading consultancy on airline ancillary revenue (revenue from baggage fees, re-booking fees and sources over and beyond ticket sales) says many Vegas-bound passengers are heading off on a vacation and want to start their partying early, before they land. The same probably cannot be said for Elmira.

Carriers increasingly depend on ancillary revenue for their profits. A 2013 report by IdeaWorksCompany and CarTrawler, a provider of car rental systems, estimated that the world’s airlines now get close to $43 billion a year from ancillary sources, up from $23 billion in 2010.

Fees for checked bags, says Sorensen, dwarf what airlines get from selling alcohol. The difference, though, is that while baggage fees have plateaued, beverage sales and other onboard sales are continuing to grow.

The airlines that get the most revenue from their beverage sales, Sorensen tells ABC News, are those that “think like a bartender.”

Airline acronyms that can save travelers cash

“If you walked into a bar and got a free soda,” he asks, “what would that do to sales?” Many customers would take the free soda and skip buying an alcoholic drink—or any other drink for which they have to pay. The same holds true in the air, he says. Smart carriers, he says—the ones with the highest alcohol sales–don’t offer free beverages.

Virgin America does something else that’s smart, he says: Not only does Virgin America let you order cocktails from your seatback, it lets you run an open tab. Allowing passengers to keep an open tab, he says, powerfully promotes sales: “Would you order desert, if the restaurant closed out your check after the entrée?”

Analysis: Airline emissions deal may not come before EU deadline - Star Infranet

(Reuters) -Hope is blurring for a worldwide bargain to manage the air transport industry's nursery gas emanations beyond a fall deadline, in spite of the fact that disappointment could prod the industry back to the verge of an exchange war over the European Union's emanations exchanging framework.

Last November the Eu suspended its dubious plan to compel all aerial transports to purchase carbon credits for any flight landing in or withdrawing from European airspace.

The plan had hollowed European states against China, the United States, India and others, who said it disregarded their power. The Eu said it needed to act, after more than a decade of inaction on the natural effect of flying.

European authorities gave the United Nations' firm that administers flying, the International Civil Aviation Organization (Icao), more time to art a bargain in the manifestation of a worldwide administrative administration.

They have pledged to carry their own particular system into energy unless they see legitimate advancement by the Icao get together, which runs September 24 to October 4. The gathering, which might need to support any worldwide administration, meets just once each three years.

Anyway there is still difference on the best way to charge for emanations from flights that cross fringes; how to bargain decently with improving nations; and if carriers, states or both ought to be liable to regulation.

Every one of the aforementioned issues have stalled ventures to achieve a trade off.

"Consider flight a microcosm of the huge geopolitical technique," said Paul Steele, official executive of the industry assembly Air Transport Action Group and one of the specialized masters who has prompted Icao on the issue.

The aggregation, a coalition of in the ballpark of 50 plane creators, aerial shuttles and narrower affiliations like Airports Council International, needs a worldwide discharges administration, not a muddled and costly "patchwork" of frameworks around the globe.

Steele said absence of advancement on the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the U.n.'s primary atmosphere bargain and home of the Kyoto Protocol, may be holding sasses at Icao. That settlement and Icao's methodology are lawfully free, however definitely, they are joined by legislative issues.

Take "normal yet separated obligations," a contention that improved nations may as well shoulder the majority of the trouble of cutting outflows. That has been a crux staying focus at Icao, as Reuters initially reported a year ago.

Steele said a few nations expect that assuming that they bargain at Icao, it will preference broader talks in advance of 2015, when atmosphere arbitrators plan to secure another bargain to cut outflows under the U.n. Structure Convention.

What's more in this way, even as flying industry guides urge Icao to sledge out a bargain, talks at an elevated profile Icao advisory group have viably broken down, and a crux part of the office's representing gathering has said a determination may not be prepared in time for the get together.

That could raise the clash, particularly since a U.s. law marked in November disallows any U.s. air transport from consenting to the Eu law. Keeping in mind China incompletely lifted a retaliatory barricade of some $11 billion in Airbus stream requests a month ago, another section in the clash could put those requests at danger.

Abnormal amount Fizzle

Icao has quietly set models and administers on everything from load wellbeing to aviation authority since 1944, arriving at bargains between nations that may coincide on practically nothing, aside from the worth of keeping planes in the sky.

However on environmental change, the representatives presented on Montreal are part of a full and complex geopolitical clash that has small to do with planes. They appear to have distinguished as much the previous fall, when talks at Icao's overseeing chamber stalled.

Looking to break the impasse, they met another assembly, which Kerryn Macaulay, Australia's chamber agent, as of late said was to incorporate "a portion of the leaders in government" who may have the ability to hash out bargains.

It was the making of that "large amount bunch" that the Eu refered to when it suspended its plan. It was only another council, yet it was seen as an indication of great trust, and a chance to get a bargain.

However as Macaulay told a meeting had by the Air Transport Action Group in Montreal on May 13, the abnormal amount aggregate made small advance. A remarkable inverse: "In a few regions there has been a danger of reviving old issues that the chamber actually was as of late settled on."

It is not clear if the abnormal amount assembly will meet once more, and the Icao administering gathering is presently finishing up a draft determination in which next to no has been concurred.

"We will press on to tackle that determination, if and when fundamental up to the day preceding the get together," Macaulay said, including that it still may not be primed in time.

"Not What We Expected"-Eu

In any case regardless of the possibility that a determination is prepared for the get together, it might endeavor to rein in the Eu framework, instead of securing a worldwide elective, as European authorities had trusted.

Icao's technique is part into two strings: searching for a worldwide "market-based measure" to decrease discharges, for example a top and exchange framework or carbon counterbalancing; and a "structure" report that lays out how showcase based measures ought to be actualized.

Some see a "skeleton" just administering nearby or local frameworks like the Eu's, and not determining any debates on the best way to actualize a worldwide plan. A draft system proposed by the United States early in the not so distant future, and acquired by Reuters, might constrain the land arrive at of outflows frameworks.

Lourdes Maurice, official head for environment and vigor at the U.s. Elected Aviation Administration, said a week ago that the United States needs the skeleton to take a "national or local airspace approach," where nations or coalitions would just manage discharges in their own particular airspace.

That might put in the vicinity of 80 percent of emanations from flight out of span of national or local carbon assesses, Macaulay said, as numerous flights are over universal waters.

At the same time Elina Bardram, answerable for carbon advertises in the flight and sea parts for the European Commission's atmosphere division, said a suggestion that did not do anything considerable to secure nature's turf is "not what we envisioned."

(Reporting by Allison Martell in Montreal; Additional reporting by Valerie Volcovici in Washington; Editing by Janet Guttsman and Tim Dobbyn)

(Reuters)